NATIONAL PEOPLE’S TRIBUNAL ON KANDHAMAL
JURY’S PRELIMINARY FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
24 AUGUST 2010
The National People’s Tribunal (NPT) on Kandhamal, held in New Delhi on 22-24 August 2010, was organized by the National Solidarity Forum - a countrywide solidarity platform of concerned social activists, media persons, researchers, legal experts, film makers, artists, writers, scientists and civil society organizations to assist the victims and survivors of the Kandhamal violence 2008 to seek justice, accountability and peace and to restore the victim-survivors’ right to a dignified life.
The jury of the NPT was headed by Justice A.P. Shah, former Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court. Joining him as jury members were Harsh Mander (member of National Advisory Council), Mahesh Bhatt (film maker and activist), Miloon Kothari (former UN Special Rapporteur on Right to Housing), P.S.Krishnan (retired Secretary, Government of India), Rabi Das (senior journalist based in Bhubaneswar), Ruth Manorama (women and dalit rights activist), Sukumar Muralidharan (Delhi-based free lance journalist), Syeeda Hameed (member of Planning Commission, Government of India), Vahida Nainar (expert on international law, mass crimes and gender), Vinod Raina (scientist and social activist with a specific focus on right to education), Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat (former Chief of Naval Staff) and Vrinda Grover (advocate, Delhi High Court).
******
Introduction
Thousands of dalits and tribals belonging to the Christian minorities in the Kandhamal region of Orissa were victims of organized violence starting in August 2007. According to government figures during the last bout of violence from August to December 2008, in Kandhamal district alone more than 600 villages were ransacked, 5600 houses were looted and burnt, 54000 people were left homeless, 38 people were murdered. Human rights groups estimate that over 100 people were killed, including women, disabled and aged persons and children; and an unestimated number suffered severe physical injuries and mental trauma. While there are reports of four women being gang-raped, many more victims of sexual assault are believed to have been intimidated into silence. 295 churches and other places of worship, big and small, were destroyed. 13 schools, colleges, and offices of 5 non-profit organizations damaged. About 30,000 people were uprooted and lived in relief camps and continue to be displaced. During this period about 2,000 people belonging to minority communities were forced to repudiate their Christian faith. More than 10,000 children had their education severely disrupted due to displacement and fear. Today, after two years, the situation has not improved, although the administration time and again claims it is peaceful and has returned to normalcy. With a view to create conditions for justice and accountability for the violence, the National Solidarity Forum organized a National People’s Tribunal (NPT) on 22-24 August 2010 at the Constitution Club in Delhi. The objectives of the Tribunal were:
1. To provide a platform for victim-survivors and their families to voice their experiences, perceptions, demands and aspirations to civil society at large;
2. To study and analyse the long-term and short-term causes and impact of the Kandhamal violence;
3. To assess the role, conduct and responsibility of various organizations, groups of individuals or persons, in influencing, precipitating and escalating the violence;
4. To assess the role played by the state and district administration and public officials, including the police, before, during and after the pogrom;
5. To assess the functioning of the criminal justice system for fixing criminal accountability and prosecuting the guilty;
6. To study and analyse the various rights of victims and survivors that have been violated during the violence and thereafter;
7. To recommend both short-term and long-term remedial measures for promoting an efficient delivery of justice and reparations, and for strengthening peace-building, prevention of communal violence and secularism; and
8. To present the findings and recommendations before civil society, including the media, and to persuade the government and other agencies to pursue the necessary follow up action to restore dignity, right to life, justice and peace to the victim-survivors of Kandhamal violence.
The Tribunal heard 43 victims, survivors and their representatives, and 15 experts who presented studies / fact-finding reports on the Kandhamal violence. Documentation related to each case, consisting of affidavits, court documents, medical and other supporting documents, as well as copies of reports and studies on the violence were placed before the jury for its perusal. The depositions were on a range of issues including a) adivasi and dalit rights to religious and culture freedom; b) role of police, administration and the criminal justice system; c) issues relating to housing, compensation, relief, rehabilitation, food and livelihood, displacement and migration of the victims; d) impact on children and their education; e) gender violence and violations of human rights; and f) role of media, political parties, and civil society in peace and reconciliation processes. Formal invitations were extended to the Ministry of Minority Affairs, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Ministry of Women’s Development and Child Welfare, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, as well as the National Human Rights Commission, National Commission for Minorities, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, National Commission for Scheduled Tribes and National Commission for Women to participate in the proceedings of the Tribunal. However, there was no participation from the concerned ministries and commissions.
PREAMBLE
The jury records its shock and deep concern for the heinous and brutal manner in which the members of the Christian community, a vast majority of who are dalits and tribals were killed, dismembered, sexually assaulted and tortured. The deliberate destruction of evidence pertaining to these crimes came to the attention to the jury. There was rampant and systematic looting and destruction of houses and places of worship and means of livelihood. The victim-survivors continue to be intimidated and systematically denied protection and access to justice.
From the testimonies heard and the detailed reports received, the jury is convinced that the carnage in Kandhamal is an act of communalism mainly directed against the Christian community, a vast majority of who are of scheduled caste origin and anyone who supported or worked with the community. It is clear to us that there was deliberate strategy of targeting of the community, fed by groups of the Hindutva ideology such as Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), Bajrang Dal and the active members of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
The jury is further convinced that the communal violence in Kandhamal was the consequence of a subversion of constitutional governance in which state agents were complicit.
The jury acknowledges and appreciates the courage, determination and resilience of the victim-survivors and the human rights defenders supporting them, who have braved physical, psychological and economic hardships and intimidation to tell their stories before this Tribunal, thereby breaking the culture of silence. After listening to the myriad accounts of all the victim-survivors and their representatives, as well as the experts who presented a summary of their studies / fact-finding reports on the Kandhamal violence, the jury offers the following preliminary findings and recommendations:
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
The jury observes that a majority of victim-survivors and their families are from marginalized groups, particularly from the dalit and adivasi (SC and ST) Christian community, and that most live in abject poverty and on the brink of despair. The victim-survivors and their families are yet to obtain justice, rehabilitation or regain a right to life with dignity. The victims/survivors have undergone incredible hardships, including physical and psychological trauma, threats and humiliation, deprivation of a dignity, an extensive loss of movable and immovable property, a source and means of livelihood and their right to a decent standard of living - including food, housing, education and health services. They have faced persecution in all its forms – such as social and economic boycott as well as religious, caste-based and cultural discrimination. They live under a constant threat to their lives and personal security and continue to suffer from trauma. The consequence is that even two year after the outbreak of the violence, the victim-survivors are unable to return to their villages and resume their normal way of life. They continue to be subjected to constant and overt manifestations of communal, caste and class-based discrimination. All victim-survivors and their representatives who deposed before the Tribunal strongly articulated their demand for justice and security.
The jury observes that communal forces have used religious conversions as an issue for political mobilisation and to incite horrific forms of violence and discrimination against the Christians of SC origin and their supporters in Kandhamal. The object is to dominate them and ensure that they never rise above their low caste status and remain subservient to the upper castes. The jury observes, with deep concern, that a range of coercive tactics have been used by the communal forces for conversion or re-conversion of a person into the Hindu fold, including threat, intimidation, social and economic boycott and coercion, as well as the institutionalization of humiliating rituals. The state and district administrations have, on no occasion, intervened to protect the freedom of religion and freedom of expression.
The jury observes, with concern, the institutionalised communal and casteist bias of state agencies, and their deliberate dereliction of constitutionally mandated duties, their connivance with communal forces, participation in and support to the violence and a deliberate scuttling of processes of justice through acts of commission and omission. The state agencies have blatantly failed to extend much-needed institutional support to victim-survivors and protect them from ostracism , socio-economic boycott and subjugation by non-state actors.
SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS
A. State’s Complicity and Collusion
• Institutional Bias: All testimonies and reports have pointed towards the complicity of the police – senior officers as well as the constabulary – during the phase of violence, and their collusion with the wrongdoers during the phase of investigation and prosecution. Based on the testimonies, the jury concludes that this was not an aberration of a few individual police men, but evidence of an institutional bias against the targeted Christian community.
• Failure to Prevent the Violence: The police deliberately failed to prevent the violence by a) non-implementation of the recommendations made by the National Commission for Minorities in its reports of January and April 2008; b) permitting the funeral procession of Swami Lakshmananda through a 170 kilometre route through communally sensitive areas; c) allowing hate speeches and incitement to violence; d) allowing a series of programmes by the communal forces (such as the bandh of 25 August 2008, shraddhanjali sabhas and dharnas by Hindu religous leaders). In particular, the permission given by the state administration to the funeral procession cannot, in any way, be a mere lapse of judgment. The state agencies displayed long overdue political resolve when they stopped VHP leader Praveen Togadia from visiting Kandhamal in March 2010. This late awakening was however, of little help to the victim-survivors of the district.
• Suspension of Police Officials: Many witnesses deposed about the failure of the police to protect them from the violence and their refusal to register First Information Reports subsequently. There were long delayed actions to check police complicity, when five police officials were suspended for misconduct and negligence in connection with the sexual assault on Sister Meena, and the identification of 13 police officials for failure to protect persons and property in Kandhamal by A.K. Upadhyay, DIG (Training).
• Destruction of Evidence by Public Officials: The jury is constrained to observe that public officials have colluded in the destruction of evidence and there is testimony directly implicating the District Collector in this misdemeanour (Case No. 24)
B. Communal Forces, Freedom of Religion and Discrimination
• Forcible Conversions: Testimonies pointed towards forcible conversion of Christians to Hinduism during the violence and subsequently, as a condition for their return to their villages. No known action has been initiated against any of the perpetrators by the administration under the provisions either of criminal law, or the state’s Freedom of Religion Act.
• Serious Violation of Religious Freedom: The violent intimidation of the Christian community, accompanied by social sanctions against the practice of Christianity, the destruction and desecration of places of worship, the forcible conversions to Hinduism, the killing and torture of victims and survivors for their refusal to repudiate their faith, are all acts violative of the constitutional guarantees of right to life, equality and non-discrimination, as well as the right to religious freedom.
• The Role of Hindutva forces: The accused identified in all witness testimonies were members of Hindutva organisations. This is substantiated by the response of Orissa Chief Minister, to a query raised in the state Legislative Assembly, on 23 November 2009. In his written response, Mr. Naveen Patnaik said that pursuant to investigation, 85 members of the RSS, 321 members of the VHP and 118 members of the Bajrang Dal had been arrested.
• Discrimination on the Basis of Caste and Religion: The targeted violence against dalit Christians, as well as the continued discrimination against them are violative of Constitutional guarantees of equality, non-discrimination, right to a dignified life and the prohibition of untouchability. Further, they amount to a serious violation of all provisions of the UN Convention on Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), a convention ratified by India. The Concluding Observations of its forty-ninth session held in August/September 1996 (as it reviewed India's tenth to fourteenth periodic reports under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination, 1965), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination affirmed that "the situation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes falls within the scope of" the Convention. The Committee states that "descent" contained in Article 1 of the Convention does not refer solely to race, and includes the situation of scheduled castes and tribes.
C. Sexual Violence and Other Gender Concerns
• Silence and Invisibility: The jury observes, with deep concern, that silence continues to prevail in matters of sexual assault. This applies at all levels, including documenting, reporting, investigating, charging and prosecuting cases. Though witness testimonies show that sexual violence was rampant, there are only five reported cases, and an even smaller number that have been registered and are pending in the courts. One of the testimonies refers to the gang rape (Case No. 3), but none of the accused has been formally charged.
• Special Vulnerability of Women: While all victims and survivors face intimidation and threats, women face the additional danger of sexual violence not just against themselves but also against their daughters (Case No. 12). The immediate consequence of such threats is a hightened sense of vulnerability and a restriction on their movement. The jury observes that the threat of sexual assault against women continues to be used as a tool to prevent families from returning to their villages, to prevent women from resuming their livelihood activities, and pursuing justice.
• Violation of international covenants: The pattern of violence against women is violative of constitutional guarantees of equality, non-discrimination on the ground of sex as well as a right to life with dignity. In addition, the attacks violate international standards, including the UN Convention on Elimination of Violence Against Women (CEDAW) which has been ratified by India. The CEDAW Committee, through General Recommendation 19, has clarified that gender-based violence, that is, violence that is directed against a woman because she is a woman or that affects women disproportionately, amounts to discrimination against women.
D. Failure of the Criminal Justice System
• Arbitrary Exercise of Discretionary Power: The jury observes, with concern, an arbitrary exercise of the discretionary power vested in the police and the prosecuting agencies. In many instances, the police have refused to register FIRs, have delayed registering FIRs by 2-5 months, and dissuaded victim-survivors from registering FIRs and coerced them to omit the names of perpetrators and other details from the FIRs, particularly if they indicated the complicity of public officials or members of communal organizations. Victim-survivors were also shunted between various police stations for registration of FIRs in contexts where their safety was at risk.
• Arrests: Many victim-survivors deposed before the jury that the perpetrators of heinous crimes had not been arrested, and were roaming freely and continuing to threaten, intimidate and humiliate them. Testimonies point to an inordinate delay in arresting the perpetrators, and a failure to arrest many more, contributing to an overall climate of impunity. Honest police officials who attempted to arrest perpetrators were threatened. Testimonies indicate that victim-survivors were often threatened with arrest under fabricated charges in order to silence them and deter them from pursuing justice.
• Investigation & Prosecution: The deliberate destruction of evidence, particularly of killings, through the burning or disposal of bodies, has resulted in the absence of forensic evidence in many cases. Investigations were marked by a neglect of the basic requirements of gathering evidence, which severely impaired the efficacy of the prosecution. Delay in obtaining forensic evidence, failure in obtaining corroborative evidence and the rampant intimidation of victim-survivors and witnesses, have led to many acquittals.
• Appreciation of Evidence by the Fast Track Courts: Upon perusal of judgments, affidavits and statements, the jury concludes that the judicial weighing of evidence failed to recognise the extraordinary context in which these mass crimes have been committed. Minor discrepancies in witness testimonies in court have been given undue weightage, leading to an alarmingly high number of acquittals.
• Judgment and Sentencing: Studies indicate that lenient sentences have been awarded without an acknowledgment of the gravity of the crimes committed and their consequences, both in terms of heinous killings and assault, as well as rampant looting of movable property and destruction of immovable property belonging to the dalit and adivasi Christians. A fine of Rs. 2000 has been mechanically imposed, without any correlation with the value of property destroyed. Further there seems to have been little attempt to apply S. 357 of the Cr.PC which provides for an imposition of a higher amount of fine, which could be recovered and paid to victim-survivors as compensation.
• Gaps in Indian Criminal Law: The jury observes that clear gaps exist in the criminal law to prosecute and punish those responsible for targeted mass violence. These include the absence of investigative procedures and evidentiary rules relating to mass crimes, such as punishing for murder even in the absence of the body of deceased. The protections guaranteed by law to public servants obstruct their accountability. Such gaps make dispensation of justice in contexts of mass violence extremely difficult.
• Relevance of International Criminal Law: The testimonies shows that the Kandhamal violence meets all the elements of Crimes Against Humanity as defined in applicable international law. The jury has come across cases where victims were dismembered or burnt alive, constituting the crime of torture under jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals. (The International Criminal Court’s definition of torture in Article 7 does not require that torture be committed by public officials.) That a victim was forced to drink cow urine and shave his head amounts to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment under the United Nations Convention Against Torture.
E. Protection of Victims and Witnesses, Access to Justice & Fair Trial
• Willingness to Testify in Court: Those who deposed before the Tribunal were keen, ready and willing to depose before the Fast Track courts. However, they face severe intimidation and threats. Despite the concerned authorities being informed, no steps have been taken to provide any protection to the witnesses and victim-survivors.
• Hostile Atmosphere in Court: The atmosphere in the trial court (Fast Track courts) was described as hostile. The atmosphere was fearful as the accused were accompanied by a large number of persons representing the accused, and from communal forces. The atmosphere in court is not conducive to a fair trial. There has been no initiative taken, either by the Prosecutor or the court, to hold the proceedings in camera.
• Absence of Safe Passage: Victims who have dared to lodge complaints & witnesses who have courageously given evidence in court are unable to return to their homes. There is no guarantee of safe passage to and from the courts. They are living in other cities and villages, many of them in hiding, as they apprehend danger to their lives.
• Threat of Sexual Assault: Women victims and witnesses have received constant threats of sexual violence and rape to themselves and their daughters. Ironically most of the accused roam freely and live in their villages and homes.
• Absence of Free Legal Aid: Since most of the victim-survivors are from underprivileged communities, there is a dire need for quality legal aid services at state expenses. None of those who deposed before us had been extended free legal aid services. Most victim-survivors have been supported in court through the initiatives of non-profit organizations. The failure of the state to provide free legal aid has contributed substantially to an absence of fair trial.
F. Concerns Related to Children
The most important finding related to children status in Kandahamal is sense of hopelessness, injustice discrimination and fear prevailing among children, threatening to severely impact their growth and development.
• Mental Health: Children are in deep state of mental trauma. There has been no trauma counselling for the affected children and adolescents in Kandhamal. Even today they have night mares of running in the jungle, with the killers in pursuit, are scared of any loud sound and are afraid of people walking in groups or talking loudly.
• Education: Large number of children has dropped out of school due to financial and social insecurity and many have them have gone out for work. Many of them had to discontinue their education due to discrimination meted out to them by the school authority and also in some cases by children in schools. Many children were forced to change school and many of them opted for residential schools out of the state. Post violence many dropped out due to the inability of the families to bear the expenses, fear, and also due to lack of facilities to commute to school.
• Child Labour: Many children have left education and have gone to Kerala, Surat and neighbouring states. Even girls have gone to Udhagamandalam (Ooty)and working in coffee plantation. there is no data available with the district Labour Office regarding the present status of child labour in the state. Last child labour census in the district was done in 1997.
• Child Trafficking: There are rise incidences of trafficking for children, mainly for labour, sexual exploitation and abuse. Though there are no consolidated data on number of children being trafficked post violence in the district, we have come across some instances.
G. Reparations
• Compensation: Compensation for loss of life, injuries and loss of / damage to property has been awarded in an extremely arbitrary manner. The amounts awarded are grossly inadequate and do permit victim-survivors to regain the standards of living enjoyed prior to the violence. The award of compensation does not recognize sexual assault or the extent of loss of house and movable property destruction, the exclusion of which has caused immense difficulties to victim-survivors and their families.
• Relief and Humanitarian Assistance: From the testimonies of victim-survivors and reports, it is evident that the relief camps did not provide for basic facilities such as nutritious food, clean water and sanitation, or adequate security. There was a lack of trauma counselling, medical assistance and other forms of humanitarian assistance that ought to have been made available to all victim-survivors in the relief camps.
• Safe Return or Resettlement: Many victim-survivors have been forced or duped into returning to their villages, where they have faced continuous threat, intimidation and fear of attacks if they did not repudiate their faith. Many victim-survivors and their families continue to live on the outskirts of their villages, without any source of livelihood. The state and district authorities have taken no proactive measures at creating an atmosphere conducive for the safe return of victim-survivors to their villages. By failing to recognize the right of all victim-survivors and their families to a safe return to their villages or resettlement at state expense, the state has grossly violated the UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement 1998.
• Reconstruction of Houses and Places of Worship: Some victim-survivors have been provided inadequate compensation for rebuilding their houses and many excluded from an award of compensation altogether. A majority of places of religious worship that had been damaged or destroyed during the violence, have not been re-built. The amounts awarded as compensation to some are grossly inadequate for re-building such structures, while many others have been denied compensation altogether on technical grounds. The jury strongly believes that reconstruction of houses and places of worship at state expense would restore a sense of confidence and justice among the victim-survivors and their families, and restore them to a life with dignity.
• Livelihood and Education: Many educational institutions that had been damaged or destroyed during the violence are yet to be rebuilt, thereby depriving children from victim-survivor communities of their right to education, jeopardizing their future opportunities and causing a generational setback for emerging deprived dalit communities. Many victim-survivors who lost their source of livelihood, including agricultural land and government jobs, due to the mass displacement that took place, have received no assistance from the state for a restoration of the same. Many testimonies presented before the jury highlighted the fact that victim-survivors have been illegally deprived of employment under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act subsequent to the violence.
• Peace-building: Although village level peace committees had been set up, the testimonies before the jury as well as studies and reports indicate that such committees have not enjoyed the confidence of the victim-survivors and have been used as a platform for further intimidation. Notably, there has been no involvement of women in peace-building and negotiating processes, which violates standards set by international law, particularly UN Security Council Resolution 1325.
H. Human Rights Defenders
Non-profit organizations and human rights defenders have been targeted for their role in assisting victims with aid, relief, rehabilitation and process of justice. Victim-survivors have testified with regard to the destruction of personal and official property, attacks and damage to the offices of such organizations. These are contrary to the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders that calls upon the State to protect Human Rights Defenders and their work.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Enquiry into and suspension of police and administrative officials responsible for grave dereliction of duty.
• Proactive prevention of programmes planned by Hindutva forces that are divisive and propagate hate such as kalash yatra, Shraddhanjali sabhas (memorial meetings) and dharnas by Hindu religious leaders of Orissa held to perform rituals to eliminate the ‘enemies of Hindus.’
• Sections 153 A and B of the Indian Penal Code be strictly enforced.
• National Legal Services Authorities at both State and Central level to set up legal cell to assist victims to register FIRs where they were not registered or inaccurately registered, re-open closed cases, and transfer pending cases to outside the Kandhamal jurisdiction.
• A Special Investigation Team (SIT) be constituted to re-examine the already registered FIRs for accuracy, examine registrations of fresh FIRs, the trials that resulted in acquittals due to intimidation and/or lack of evidence and recommend the trials that need to be transferred or fresh trial conducted outside Kandhamal;
• Proactively identify cases of sexual assault has been grossly underreported due to fear and intimidation; and recognize and charge sexual assault in FIRs where they have not been so recognized.
• Appoint Special Public Prosecutors who enjoy the confidence of the affected community.
• State must provide protection to victims and witnesses before, during and after the trial process according to the guidelines provided in the recent judgment of the Delhi High Court.
• Endorse the recommendations of the National Advisory Council of drafting a new bill on mass crimes against impunity and secure accountability for mass crimes. The draft be in accordance with the emerging international standards of individual criminal accountability for mass crimes as set in the statute of the International Criminal Court and jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals.
• Both the State and Central government adopt at the very minimum the Gujarat compensation package to enhance the compensation already announced. In addition, victims of sexual assault be included as a ground eligible for compensation and employment. , Compensation for loss of livelihood
• All mechanisms set up to improve the criminal justice response, provide reparations, including compensation and rehabilitation be based on human rights indicators and standards that recognises the fact that even after two years thousands continue to be displaced.
• State make all effort to provide medical and psychological, particularly trauma counceling to the victims/ survivors, particularly the women and children.
• The specific educational needs of the children who have suffered displacement as a result of the violence be address with measures such as bridge school under the Sarva siksha Abhiyan, Kasturba Balika Vidhyalaya for SCs and STs girls; and residential ashram schools.
• The livelihood schemes of the state and central government be particularly provided to the affected community including M G Narega and special thrust be given for the affected youth in the PM’s skill training mission.
• The special component plan for the SC and the tribal sub-plan for STs should given priority focus to the schemes directed at the affected community. Dalit Christians to be provided all non-statutory benefits available to schedule castes.
• All training centres both of administrative and police to focus on education and awareness about rights, secularism and constitutional gurantees to minorities.
• Restitution and Rehabilitation to follow the international standards set in paragraphs 16-18 and 25-29 of the UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement and paragraphs 52 to 68 of the UN Basic Principles and Guidelines on Development based Evictions and Displacement, 2007.
• The State should recognize the Internally Displaced Persons’ right to return to their homes and create all possible enabling conditions to facilitate such safe return in accordance with the above standards.
• Review The Orissa Freedom of Religion Act 1967 given the failure of the state machinery to prevent the violence and protect lives and properties of the people.
• Designate the affected areas as communally sensitive, appoint officers with professional integrity and sensitivity to the overall communal context and be alert to any early warning signs and develop appropriate response mechanisms to halt the brewing of hate mobilization and religious and caste-based discriminative activities.
• Given the fact that human rights violations continue to take place as outlined in this report, the NHRC should take immediate steps to initiate an investigation into the incidences of violence.
• The National Commission on protection of Children Rights should investigate the need for children of the affected community to receive trauma councelling, to respect and promote their right to education and nutrition, take specific steps to prevent child labour and child trafficking. Appropriate agencies at the central and state levels need to respond to these issues.
• All efforts by the central and state government to improve the situation in Kandhamal must comply with the provisions of international human rights instruments that India has signed and ratified including CERD, CAT, CEDAW, CESCR, CRC, , UNPCR, UNDHR.
• Confidence-building and peace-building initiatives by the state and district administration should have the participation of members of the affected community, particularly women.
• The state and district administration should, with immediate effect, implement the recommendations of the National Commission for Minorities, issued in their reports of January, April and September 2008
Justice A.P. Shah Harsh Mander Mahesh Bhatt
Former Chief Justice Member Film maker and activist
Delhi High Court National Advisory Council
P.S.Krishnan Miloon Kothari Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat
Former Secretary, Former UN Special Former Chief of Naval Staff
Government of India Rapporteur on
Right to Housing
Syeeda Hameed Vahida Nainar Sukumar Muralidharan
Member Expert Free lance journalist
Planning Commission International law
Vinod Raina Ruth Manorama Vrinda Grover
Scientist and Activists Dalit & women’s rights Advocate
Right to Education Activist
Rabi Das
Senior Journalist
Bhubaneswar
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Saturday, August 21, 2010
The deep wounds of Kandhamal
A Report to the Nation on the Second Anniversary of the Pogrom
By John Dayal
This should scare any parent – in fact any sensitive person – out of his or her complacency. Manorama Mohapatra, a District Social Welfare officer in Orissa, has reported two cases of incidents of trafficking of girl children in the Kandhamal district recently. Many other girls have been rescued from other parts of India, most notably from Hyderabad and other cities in Andhra Pradesh, which adjoins Orissa and has had age old trading ties and human migration between the two regions.]
But before I continue with the story of these two lucky girls, lucky for having been rescued, this is a capsule of the aftermath Kandhamal episode in Indian history. This is what we hope to bring before a National People’s Tribunal which will sit in Delhi from 22 to 14th August 2000 and listen to 50 victim-superiors of Kandhamal. Experts will explain the results of half a dozen research studies that have been carried out in Kandhamal in recent months – ranging from Gender violence to the psychological impact of the violence on little children. The Tribunal jury comprised of former Chief Justices of the Delhi High Court, Justice A P Shah and Justice Rajindar Sachchar. The expert panel includes film maker Mahesh Bhatt, Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat, National Advisory Council members Harsh Mander and MP Ram Dayal Munda, eminent jurist Vrinda Grover, journalist Seema Mustafa and others.
In case India has forgotten, and sometimes I fear that the people have indeed ceased to remember, Kandhamal district saw two rounds of vicious anti Christian violence in December 2007 and then in August-December 2008. Over 400 villages were purged of their Christian population, with close to 6,000 houses destroyed in mass arson and loot. As many as 295 Church buildings, big and small were destroyed, apart from dozens of Christian social centres and technical training institutions. Perhaps as many as 110 persons were brutally murdered, and we will never know the real figure because the government does not want to record and acknowledge the death of people who were injured and then crawled into the forests and succumbed days alter. And others, including newborns, who died for want of medical attention. Among the dead were women, disabled people, children, Adivasi Kondhs and Dalit Panos. Three women were gang raped and many others molested in what is politely called gender violence.
For the 54,000 persons - which is over 10,000 families -- it will take years more before they can say they have fully recovered from the trauma of the pogrom and one of India’s largest internal displacement after Gujarat 2002 not connected with large dams or natural disasters such as the Tsunami. One third of them still cannot return to their villages for they have been plainly told they will have to become Hindus before they can come. They are destined to live in ghettos or in urban slums. A few who dared were forcibly made Hindus in a simple process in which their hair was shorn and they were made to drink a mixture of cow urine and dung. This I have it from the brother of a victim. The boy suffered in silence, but the next day, ran away and is now once again a practising Christian, though not yet able to live in his own house.
The violence had also impacted on 13 other districts of Kandhamal, and saw copy cat incidents in other states, notably Karnataka, but also in Tamil Nadu, Andhra, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhatisgarh and so on. The violence died out when there was nothing more left to burn. Neither the Centre, nor the Sate authorities can really lay claim that it was their initiative or their work that brought the fires and the killings under control.
And in a travesty of justice and retribution, the chief officer still rules his fiefdom, the District collector who failed to act when the body of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad leader Lakshmanananda Saraswati, was paraded by VHP and Bajrang Dal leaders for over 270 kilometres touching most villages in the sparsely populated Kandhamal. His response then was that any action would have enraged the mobs further. Policemen, many of whom had often drunk of the “holy water” in which the man used to wash his feet during the many dishpans in his 40 year unlawful reign in the forested district, were of course not even expected to act, and remained silent and distant spectators. Most remain in their posts. Not one has been punished for dereliction of duty. The collector has apparently even been given awards by some institutes which have forgotten that had to be admonished by no less than the Supreme Court of India before he would allow humanitarian aid from Christian relief agencies to be distributed in the camps the government had set up in then wake of the violence. His reasons for denying them permission: he feared they would assist only Christian victims and would therefore exacerbate the situation, forgetting the role these very agencies had played in assisting a paralysed Stet government during the Super-cyclones and floods of past years!
The Centre, ruled by the United Progressive Alliance led by the Congress, and the State, ruled by the autocratic Naveen Pattnaik and his Biju Janata Dal – continue to quarrel over the issue. The centre said it had sent adequate forces, the chief minister said they were mere trainees. But neither Centre nor State have had the charity to look at the condition of the victims. The centre – which had been repeatedly, and in vain, been approached by the top leadership of the Christian community -- vacillated. The then Union Home Minister and now Punjab Governor, Shivraj Patil, proved his arrogance and thorough incompetence by dithering and not been able to make up his mind if the Centre could really invoke Constitutional provisions to force Pattnaik to act. Even the President of India, approached by us, could do little other than formally asking for a report. There is little Indian Presidents, who are constitutional heads, can do unless the Prime Minister and the Union Cabinet present them the relevant papers to sign.
It is this governmental paralysis that is so visible in all facets of the Kandhamal operations – relief, justice, human rehabilitation.
The Church led the initial relief. But the government stood exposed in the quality of camps it ran. Even had nosed New Delhi bureaucrats were shocked at the conditions of life, and for the few foreign delegations that could see camp life, it as worse than conditions in deep Africa, or in prisoners of war camps. More than hunger and disease, it was the indignity that human beings were subjected to, cramped under the tarpaulin, shorn of all privacy. Young girls, women and married couples suffered the worst. Unmarried girls will carry the shame and the trauma to their graves.
Form union revenue secretary K. R. Venugopal, IAS, wrote to the Orissa government: “There can never be any dignity if people practising a particular religion – here Christianity – are told that they can return to their homes only as Hindus. Such threats are unconstitutional and the State has a duty to intervene proactively to put a stop to that and guarantee peaceful residence to the citizens with a right to their religious conviction. All these involve the relevant fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens under Part III of our Constitution as in articles 19, 21 and 25, not to mention the articles that guarantee the right to equality before law and equal protection of the laws and the right not to be discriminated on any account.”
He went on to record the “the impossible conditions seen in the camps visited by us in G. Udayagri and Mandasur. The unacceptable numbers of people living in each of these camps and in each tent in these camps render their lives miserable in the extreme and inhuman. In one tent where I spent an hour at G. Udayagiri speaking to the inmates there were 48 persons of whom several were women. Its dimensions were about 25x15 feet. There was hardly space for any one to move or stretch, what to speak of privacy for women to change? Those women live in the full view of the male inmates, including their own brothers on the one hand and strangers on the other. Their sanitary requirements at a personal level, including of women who have not attained menopause have not been factored in by those who designed or are running these camps. If the official argument is that these women would not know how to use sanitary napkins or pads even if supplied, then they should be provided with whatever they are accustomed to, in consultation with them. It is deplorable that this has not been done. Outside these tents, there are less than 10 toilets for the thousands living in the camp with hardly 5 of them in usable condition.”
Two years on the conditions of the victims of Kandhamal remains in dire straits - homeless, jobless and bereft of any justice from the Pattnaik regime. Fr Ajay Singh, who is a senior activist and involved both in all three aspects of the Kandhamal struggle, says “the fact that the majority of the population of Kandhamal are Adivasis and dalits has only aggravated the criminal negligence of the administration.” Out of 3,300 complaints filed by the victims in the local police stations, only 831 have been registered as FIRs. Majority of the registered cases have not been investigated. The communal bias of the state administration has meant criminals have been acquitted one by one. Now the National Solidarity Forum, a coalition of over 55 organisations from different parts of the country has been formed to take up the cause of justice for the victims of the Kandhamal pogrom.
I have seen how the legal system works in Kandhamal. The two fast track courts set up in a government building in Phulbani, the district capital, are examples of just how justice systems ought not to be conducted. The courtyards of the courts are filled with RSS activists, and witnesses who come are threatened almost within hearing distance of the judges. The two policemen at the court can merely look on. Inside, with the victims getting no independent legal help, they remain at the mercy of two hard pressed and entirely enlightened Public Prosecutors. Their own probity could be questioned if there were competent prosecution lawyers assisting the witnesses in cross examinations and speaking on behalf of the victims. The results are inevitable. There is small punishment in minor cases, but the major cases of murder see the killers go scot free. In the case of the gang rape of the Nun, it took the Christian defence lawyers months before they could win in the High court to get the case transferred from Kandhamal to Cuttack, which is the seat of the High Court of Orissa. But even here, the proceedings do not see the public prosecutors and police actually assisting the cause of justice.
We await the judgment which may take some time. Of the rest, the statistical summary explains the miscarriage of justice in the district.
--------- -
Complaints lodged after of 2008 3232
Cases Registered (FIRs) 831
No of Case were commuted to the fast tract courts 193
No. Cases under trial 95
No. Cases disposed (Filed as Closed) 91
No. Persons Convicted 176
Life imprisonment Sentence 5
Persons Acquitted 653
Persons arrested so far 794
----------- -
Noted jurist Vrinda Grover in her report “The Law must Change Its Course” has graphically analysed the judicial system and cautioned that the parody of the legal process will have far reaching implications. She and others have also demanded that the crime registration to investigation by special teams, and the trial process now follow the rigours procedures that have been set in motion in Gujarat after repeated interventions by the Supreme Court of India.
This brings me back to the case of the trafficked women. Archbishop Raphael Cheenath has referred the human trafficking as a major criminal and moral threat to the innocent of the Tribal and Dalit people. The most recent case came from the Tikably block, where a girl was lured away by a boy on the promise of marriage and was finally rescued from Jharkhand. In another case, four girls from the Daringbadi block were trafficked to Delhi to work as domestic labour. There were worse cases. In Gumamaha panchayat, 15 girls were rescued from Bhubaneswar railway station, from a person who called himself a supervisor of the noted company L&T. Another two girls, who were studying in class 7, were taken to Noida near Delhi and sexually abused and forced into prostitution. They managed to escape after two months and finally sent back home by an NGO. Activists say such incidents, disclosed to the investigating teams during interactions, are still the tip of the iceberg. According to some NGO activists, there are organised racketeers who are working the district now. Some local people of the district generally act as middlemen and lure the family members by job offers.
Displacement induced migration too has increased after the violence. According to Mr Kumar Raman Das, District Labour Officer, Child Labour, post-violence, families are migrating to other districts and states for work, making migrant labour of children. In Baliguda sub-division (nine blocks), many have migrated to states such as Kerala where wages are high and they are earning Rs 250 per day. Although he maintained that migration by women was not yet high, except in Daringbadi Block, he added that many girls were moving willingly to cities such as Delhi to work as domestic labour.
Most importantly, he said, while migration for work has always been present, and the state administration in Kerala and other places had been supportive so far, post-riots, there has been a sharp spurt in the number that wants to move out, which has made even the state wary and the local police uncooperative. Last year the Kerala government forced 49 migrant labourers from Kandhamal to return, while the Sub-Collector has rescued 73 migrant workers from other states. Children become the worst victim of such circumstances, tossed around and dumped like baggage, without any concern of their present or future.
Kandhamal is used to poverty and hard living. The Orissa Human Development Report, 2005 published by United Nations Development Programme in collaboration with the Federal and Orissa government records, “In 1983, the population live under the Below Poverty Line in Kandhamal district is 74 %; whereas in the same period the coastal Orissa was 67 %. In 2001, the coastal Orissa recorded a reduced percentage of people living under Below Poverty Line to 36 %; while in the same period, Kandhamal district records upward swing of people living under Below Poverty Line up to 75%.” Kandhamal is the second least developed on overall human development index while it is least on health index of Orissa. Tribal and Dalit populations living Below Poverty Line levels is as high as 92% and 87% respectively.
There seems a dim chance of the people rising above the poverty line anytime soon, because there are just no jobs, and the exiting employment schemes, reeking of corruption, seem not to reach the actual victims. Neither government nor Church seems to have come to grips with the problem. An earlier attempt to provide means of self employment to the people has been all but abandoned – businesses that were restored after the 2007 violence were once again destroyed within eight months, and that makes people afraid to invest.
Kandhamal is also used to disease and sickness. Access to health care remains critical. Even in normal times Kandhamal is endemic in malaria, brain fever with the major annual death tolls. The district records one of the highest Infant Mortality Rate and overall index in the country. The violence aftermath has only added to the woes. It is difficult to reach Medicare to the refugees. The district hospital and other block hospitals are ill-equipped to meet serious medical emergencies. The forest areas and the physical insecurity make transportation of critical ill difficult.
The matter of physical rehabilitation and housing has exposed the real abdication of duty by the state government and its officials in the district headquarters. Without any reference to national standards of rehabilitation of communal violence victims, the state fixed arbitrary rates of Rs 50,000 for fully destroyed houses, and Rs 30 to 30 thousand for homes described as partially destroyed, a convenient definition that has kept most uninhabitable houses deserving only of a lower compensation. The churches’ eagerness to be seen acting somewhere has seen them come and try to help the people complete some of the houses. But after having seen the ground situation, my fears are that not even two thirds of the house will be completed this way, unless the church at large can use the full might of the Supreme court and force the government on build the houses from scratch, and build them to human standards. There are issues of land for those whose land ownership is now being questioned because they are Dalits, and this issue also needs to be redressed. The government is not able to build a single house to completion because its support of Rs 50,000 for fully and Rs 20,000 for partial damaged houses, is barely sufficient for mere walls; leaving the house shell without roofs. Even those houses which escaped destruction, were looted, and there is no provision to help people rebuild their lives.
But I feel the real concern is about the children of Kandhamal. I accompanied various European Union teams to Kandhamal, official and unofficial, and I was struck that both men and women in the tams thought of the plight and psychological status, the hiatus in education, and the lack of expert counselling as ;possibly the most major issues in the ravaged district. Over 12000 had their studies discontinued, or severely interrupted. Children in the higher classes – the hopes of a better life for the future – were the worst affected as they did not study almost a full academic year. For the girls, who are due to sit for boards’ examination for 10th and 12th class, this really meant an end to their education, and an end to their dreams and ambitions of a better life. The trauma remains a nightmare, and it may take years before they are healed, if ever.
For me, this is the final tragedy of Kandhamal. An entire generation has been seared by the violence born out of hate and intolerance projected by a specific fascist ideology, fuelled by political and religious competiveness, the fanaticism of one man now dead, murdered by the Maoists in his own home. The tragedy has been compounded by the incompetence of the administration, the utter lack of a sense of responsibility by the bureaucracy and police. The human tragedy seems not matter to Chief minister Naveen Pattnaik, and even his political rivals, the Congress. That is the final tragedy. For Orissa and its ruling elite, Kandhamal does not exist, much less matter. It is the invisible wound, the hidden tumour, which may fester and injure thousands of poor, but does not politically hurt the rulers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With main Kandhamal Report
The National Solidarity Forum, a coalition of over 55 organisations from different parts of the country, which was formed this summer to take up the cause of justice for the victims of the Kandhamal pogrom held an Exhibition at Constitution Club on 22nd April depicting the carnage through drawings, paintings, photographs and semi destroyed artefacts from the burnt down Churches of the district. The exhibition, inaugurated by noted poet and Member of Parliament Javed Akhtar preceded a National People’s Tribunal. The Tribunal jury comprised of former Chief Justices of the Delhi High Court, Justice A P Shah and Justice Rajindar Sachchar. The expert panel includes film maker Mahesh Bhatt, Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat, National Advisory Council members Harsh Mander and MP Ram Dayal Munda, eminent jurist Vrinda Grover, journalist Seema Mustafa and others. The finale was a National Protest Day on 25th August 20101 in Delhi – and also in Bangalore and Mumbai – entitled “No More Kandhamal’. A list of demands has been presented to the Central and State governments by the National Solidarity Forum at the Protest march.
DEMANDS:
The National Solidarity Forum demands:
1. Immediate prosecution of the police officials who failed to register FIRs and who have allowed criminals to escape justice;
2. Prosecution of policemen who supported the communal violence in Kandhamal;
3. Prosecution of all those who are responsible for forcible conversions to Hinduism;
4. Transfer investigation of the Kandhamal violence to the Central Bureau of Investigation or SIT;
5. Full compensation for the over 5,600 houses destroyed in mass arson;
6. Compensation for victims of gender violence;
7. Compensation for loss of livelihood for two years;
8. Full compensation to all next of kin of those who died in the riots;
9. Resettlement of victims with provision of security in their villages;
10. Employment for men and women victims;
11. Trauma counselling for children, women and men;
12. Assistance for children, especially girls who cannot continue their education as their school certificates have been burnt;
13. Assistance for a large number of survivors whose documents of land and property were destroyed;
14. Implementation of a basic witness protection scheme and provision of assistance and remuneration to victims in order to ensure their testimony in court;
15. Repeal of the Orissa Freedom of Religion Act, 1967, which fuels prejudice towards religious minorities;
16. Establishment of a State Commission for Minorities, on the model of the national Commission for Minorities;
17. Prosecution of District, state and administrative officials for their dereliction of duty during violence and rehabilitation
[This article has also been published in the Indian Currents, New Delhi in its edition dated 22 August 2010]
By John Dayal
This should scare any parent – in fact any sensitive person – out of his or her complacency. Manorama Mohapatra, a District Social Welfare officer in Orissa, has reported two cases of incidents of trafficking of girl children in the Kandhamal district recently. Many other girls have been rescued from other parts of India, most notably from Hyderabad and other cities in Andhra Pradesh, which adjoins Orissa and has had age old trading ties and human migration between the two regions.]
But before I continue with the story of these two lucky girls, lucky for having been rescued, this is a capsule of the aftermath Kandhamal episode in Indian history. This is what we hope to bring before a National People’s Tribunal which will sit in Delhi from 22 to 14th August 2000 and listen to 50 victim-superiors of Kandhamal. Experts will explain the results of half a dozen research studies that have been carried out in Kandhamal in recent months – ranging from Gender violence to the psychological impact of the violence on little children. The Tribunal jury comprised of former Chief Justices of the Delhi High Court, Justice A P Shah and Justice Rajindar Sachchar. The expert panel includes film maker Mahesh Bhatt, Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat, National Advisory Council members Harsh Mander and MP Ram Dayal Munda, eminent jurist Vrinda Grover, journalist Seema Mustafa and others.
In case India has forgotten, and sometimes I fear that the people have indeed ceased to remember, Kandhamal district saw two rounds of vicious anti Christian violence in December 2007 and then in August-December 2008. Over 400 villages were purged of their Christian population, with close to 6,000 houses destroyed in mass arson and loot. As many as 295 Church buildings, big and small were destroyed, apart from dozens of Christian social centres and technical training institutions. Perhaps as many as 110 persons were brutally murdered, and we will never know the real figure because the government does not want to record and acknowledge the death of people who were injured and then crawled into the forests and succumbed days alter. And others, including newborns, who died for want of medical attention. Among the dead were women, disabled people, children, Adivasi Kondhs and Dalit Panos. Three women were gang raped and many others molested in what is politely called gender violence.
For the 54,000 persons - which is over 10,000 families -- it will take years more before they can say they have fully recovered from the trauma of the pogrom and one of India’s largest internal displacement after Gujarat 2002 not connected with large dams or natural disasters such as the Tsunami. One third of them still cannot return to their villages for they have been plainly told they will have to become Hindus before they can come. They are destined to live in ghettos or in urban slums. A few who dared were forcibly made Hindus in a simple process in which their hair was shorn and they were made to drink a mixture of cow urine and dung. This I have it from the brother of a victim. The boy suffered in silence, but the next day, ran away and is now once again a practising Christian, though not yet able to live in his own house.
The violence had also impacted on 13 other districts of Kandhamal, and saw copy cat incidents in other states, notably Karnataka, but also in Tamil Nadu, Andhra, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhatisgarh and so on. The violence died out when there was nothing more left to burn. Neither the Centre, nor the Sate authorities can really lay claim that it was their initiative or their work that brought the fires and the killings under control.
And in a travesty of justice and retribution, the chief officer still rules his fiefdom, the District collector who failed to act when the body of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad leader Lakshmanananda Saraswati, was paraded by VHP and Bajrang Dal leaders for over 270 kilometres touching most villages in the sparsely populated Kandhamal. His response then was that any action would have enraged the mobs further. Policemen, many of whom had often drunk of the “holy water” in which the man used to wash his feet during the many dishpans in his 40 year unlawful reign in the forested district, were of course not even expected to act, and remained silent and distant spectators. Most remain in their posts. Not one has been punished for dereliction of duty. The collector has apparently even been given awards by some institutes which have forgotten that had to be admonished by no less than the Supreme Court of India before he would allow humanitarian aid from Christian relief agencies to be distributed in the camps the government had set up in then wake of the violence. His reasons for denying them permission: he feared they would assist only Christian victims and would therefore exacerbate the situation, forgetting the role these very agencies had played in assisting a paralysed Stet government during the Super-cyclones and floods of past years!
The Centre, ruled by the United Progressive Alliance led by the Congress, and the State, ruled by the autocratic Naveen Pattnaik and his Biju Janata Dal – continue to quarrel over the issue. The centre said it had sent adequate forces, the chief minister said they were mere trainees. But neither Centre nor State have had the charity to look at the condition of the victims. The centre – which had been repeatedly, and in vain, been approached by the top leadership of the Christian community -- vacillated. The then Union Home Minister and now Punjab Governor, Shivraj Patil, proved his arrogance and thorough incompetence by dithering and not been able to make up his mind if the Centre could really invoke Constitutional provisions to force Pattnaik to act. Even the President of India, approached by us, could do little other than formally asking for a report. There is little Indian Presidents, who are constitutional heads, can do unless the Prime Minister and the Union Cabinet present them the relevant papers to sign.
It is this governmental paralysis that is so visible in all facets of the Kandhamal operations – relief, justice, human rehabilitation.
The Church led the initial relief. But the government stood exposed in the quality of camps it ran. Even had nosed New Delhi bureaucrats were shocked at the conditions of life, and for the few foreign delegations that could see camp life, it as worse than conditions in deep Africa, or in prisoners of war camps. More than hunger and disease, it was the indignity that human beings were subjected to, cramped under the tarpaulin, shorn of all privacy. Young girls, women and married couples suffered the worst. Unmarried girls will carry the shame and the trauma to their graves.
Form union revenue secretary K. R. Venugopal, IAS, wrote to the Orissa government: “There can never be any dignity if people practising a particular religion – here Christianity – are told that they can return to their homes only as Hindus. Such threats are unconstitutional and the State has a duty to intervene proactively to put a stop to that and guarantee peaceful residence to the citizens with a right to their religious conviction. All these involve the relevant fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens under Part III of our Constitution as in articles 19, 21 and 25, not to mention the articles that guarantee the right to equality before law and equal protection of the laws and the right not to be discriminated on any account.”
He went on to record the “the impossible conditions seen in the camps visited by us in G. Udayagri and Mandasur. The unacceptable numbers of people living in each of these camps and in each tent in these camps render their lives miserable in the extreme and inhuman. In one tent where I spent an hour at G. Udayagiri speaking to the inmates there were 48 persons of whom several were women. Its dimensions were about 25x15 feet. There was hardly space for any one to move or stretch, what to speak of privacy for women to change? Those women live in the full view of the male inmates, including their own brothers on the one hand and strangers on the other. Their sanitary requirements at a personal level, including of women who have not attained menopause have not been factored in by those who designed or are running these camps. If the official argument is that these women would not know how to use sanitary napkins or pads even if supplied, then they should be provided with whatever they are accustomed to, in consultation with them. It is deplorable that this has not been done. Outside these tents, there are less than 10 toilets for the thousands living in the camp with hardly 5 of them in usable condition.”
Two years on the conditions of the victims of Kandhamal remains in dire straits - homeless, jobless and bereft of any justice from the Pattnaik regime. Fr Ajay Singh, who is a senior activist and involved both in all three aspects of the Kandhamal struggle, says “the fact that the majority of the population of Kandhamal are Adivasis and dalits has only aggravated the criminal negligence of the administration.” Out of 3,300 complaints filed by the victims in the local police stations, only 831 have been registered as FIRs. Majority of the registered cases have not been investigated. The communal bias of the state administration has meant criminals have been acquitted one by one. Now the National Solidarity Forum, a coalition of over 55 organisations from different parts of the country has been formed to take up the cause of justice for the victims of the Kandhamal pogrom.
I have seen how the legal system works in Kandhamal. The two fast track courts set up in a government building in Phulbani, the district capital, are examples of just how justice systems ought not to be conducted. The courtyards of the courts are filled with RSS activists, and witnesses who come are threatened almost within hearing distance of the judges. The two policemen at the court can merely look on. Inside, with the victims getting no independent legal help, they remain at the mercy of two hard pressed and entirely enlightened Public Prosecutors. Their own probity could be questioned if there were competent prosecution lawyers assisting the witnesses in cross examinations and speaking on behalf of the victims. The results are inevitable. There is small punishment in minor cases, but the major cases of murder see the killers go scot free. In the case of the gang rape of the Nun, it took the Christian defence lawyers months before they could win in the High court to get the case transferred from Kandhamal to Cuttack, which is the seat of the High Court of Orissa. But even here, the proceedings do not see the public prosecutors and police actually assisting the cause of justice.
We await the judgment which may take some time. Of the rest, the statistical summary explains the miscarriage of justice in the district.
--------- -
Complaints lodged after of 2008 3232
Cases Registered (FIRs) 831
No of Case were commuted to the fast tract courts 193
No. Cases under trial 95
No. Cases disposed (Filed as Closed) 91
No. Persons Convicted 176
Life imprisonment Sentence 5
Persons Acquitted 653
Persons arrested so far 794
----------- -
Noted jurist Vrinda Grover in her report “The Law must Change Its Course” has graphically analysed the judicial system and cautioned that the parody of the legal process will have far reaching implications. She and others have also demanded that the crime registration to investigation by special teams, and the trial process now follow the rigours procedures that have been set in motion in Gujarat after repeated interventions by the Supreme Court of India.
This brings me back to the case of the trafficked women. Archbishop Raphael Cheenath has referred the human trafficking as a major criminal and moral threat to the innocent of the Tribal and Dalit people. The most recent case came from the Tikably block, where a girl was lured away by a boy on the promise of marriage and was finally rescued from Jharkhand. In another case, four girls from the Daringbadi block were trafficked to Delhi to work as domestic labour. There were worse cases. In Gumamaha panchayat, 15 girls were rescued from Bhubaneswar railway station, from a person who called himself a supervisor of the noted company L&T. Another two girls, who were studying in class 7, were taken to Noida near Delhi and sexually abused and forced into prostitution. They managed to escape after two months and finally sent back home by an NGO. Activists say such incidents, disclosed to the investigating teams during interactions, are still the tip of the iceberg. According to some NGO activists, there are organised racketeers who are working the district now. Some local people of the district generally act as middlemen and lure the family members by job offers.
Displacement induced migration too has increased after the violence. According to Mr Kumar Raman Das, District Labour Officer, Child Labour, post-violence, families are migrating to other districts and states for work, making migrant labour of children. In Baliguda sub-division (nine blocks), many have migrated to states such as Kerala where wages are high and they are earning Rs 250 per day. Although he maintained that migration by women was not yet high, except in Daringbadi Block, he added that many girls were moving willingly to cities such as Delhi to work as domestic labour.
Most importantly, he said, while migration for work has always been present, and the state administration in Kerala and other places had been supportive so far, post-riots, there has been a sharp spurt in the number that wants to move out, which has made even the state wary and the local police uncooperative. Last year the Kerala government forced 49 migrant labourers from Kandhamal to return, while the Sub-Collector has rescued 73 migrant workers from other states. Children become the worst victim of such circumstances, tossed around and dumped like baggage, without any concern of their present or future.
Kandhamal is used to poverty and hard living. The Orissa Human Development Report, 2005 published by United Nations Development Programme in collaboration with the Federal and Orissa government records, “In 1983, the population live under the Below Poverty Line in Kandhamal district is 74 %; whereas in the same period the coastal Orissa was 67 %. In 2001, the coastal Orissa recorded a reduced percentage of people living under Below Poverty Line to 36 %; while in the same period, Kandhamal district records upward swing of people living under Below Poverty Line up to 75%.” Kandhamal is the second least developed on overall human development index while it is least on health index of Orissa. Tribal and Dalit populations living Below Poverty Line levels is as high as 92% and 87% respectively.
There seems a dim chance of the people rising above the poverty line anytime soon, because there are just no jobs, and the exiting employment schemes, reeking of corruption, seem not to reach the actual victims. Neither government nor Church seems to have come to grips with the problem. An earlier attempt to provide means of self employment to the people has been all but abandoned – businesses that were restored after the 2007 violence were once again destroyed within eight months, and that makes people afraid to invest.
Kandhamal is also used to disease and sickness. Access to health care remains critical. Even in normal times Kandhamal is endemic in malaria, brain fever with the major annual death tolls. The district records one of the highest Infant Mortality Rate and overall index in the country. The violence aftermath has only added to the woes. It is difficult to reach Medicare to the refugees. The district hospital and other block hospitals are ill-equipped to meet serious medical emergencies. The forest areas and the physical insecurity make transportation of critical ill difficult.
The matter of physical rehabilitation and housing has exposed the real abdication of duty by the state government and its officials in the district headquarters. Without any reference to national standards of rehabilitation of communal violence victims, the state fixed arbitrary rates of Rs 50,000 for fully destroyed houses, and Rs 30 to 30 thousand for homes described as partially destroyed, a convenient definition that has kept most uninhabitable houses deserving only of a lower compensation. The churches’ eagerness to be seen acting somewhere has seen them come and try to help the people complete some of the houses. But after having seen the ground situation, my fears are that not even two thirds of the house will be completed this way, unless the church at large can use the full might of the Supreme court and force the government on build the houses from scratch, and build them to human standards. There are issues of land for those whose land ownership is now being questioned because they are Dalits, and this issue also needs to be redressed. The government is not able to build a single house to completion because its support of Rs 50,000 for fully and Rs 20,000 for partial damaged houses, is barely sufficient for mere walls; leaving the house shell without roofs. Even those houses which escaped destruction, were looted, and there is no provision to help people rebuild their lives.
But I feel the real concern is about the children of Kandhamal. I accompanied various European Union teams to Kandhamal, official and unofficial, and I was struck that both men and women in the tams thought of the plight and psychological status, the hiatus in education, and the lack of expert counselling as ;possibly the most major issues in the ravaged district. Over 12000 had their studies discontinued, or severely interrupted. Children in the higher classes – the hopes of a better life for the future – were the worst affected as they did not study almost a full academic year. For the girls, who are due to sit for boards’ examination for 10th and 12th class, this really meant an end to their education, and an end to their dreams and ambitions of a better life. The trauma remains a nightmare, and it may take years before they are healed, if ever.
For me, this is the final tragedy of Kandhamal. An entire generation has been seared by the violence born out of hate and intolerance projected by a specific fascist ideology, fuelled by political and religious competiveness, the fanaticism of one man now dead, murdered by the Maoists in his own home. The tragedy has been compounded by the incompetence of the administration, the utter lack of a sense of responsibility by the bureaucracy and police. The human tragedy seems not matter to Chief minister Naveen Pattnaik, and even his political rivals, the Congress. That is the final tragedy. For Orissa and its ruling elite, Kandhamal does not exist, much less matter. It is the invisible wound, the hidden tumour, which may fester and injure thousands of poor, but does not politically hurt the rulers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With main Kandhamal Report
The National Solidarity Forum, a coalition of over 55 organisations from different parts of the country, which was formed this summer to take up the cause of justice for the victims of the Kandhamal pogrom held an Exhibition at Constitution Club on 22nd April depicting the carnage through drawings, paintings, photographs and semi destroyed artefacts from the burnt down Churches of the district. The exhibition, inaugurated by noted poet and Member of Parliament Javed Akhtar preceded a National People’s Tribunal. The Tribunal jury comprised of former Chief Justices of the Delhi High Court, Justice A P Shah and Justice Rajindar Sachchar. The expert panel includes film maker Mahesh Bhatt, Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat, National Advisory Council members Harsh Mander and MP Ram Dayal Munda, eminent jurist Vrinda Grover, journalist Seema Mustafa and others. The finale was a National Protest Day on 25th August 20101 in Delhi – and also in Bangalore and Mumbai – entitled “No More Kandhamal’. A list of demands has been presented to the Central and State governments by the National Solidarity Forum at the Protest march.
DEMANDS:
The National Solidarity Forum demands:
1. Immediate prosecution of the police officials who failed to register FIRs and who have allowed criminals to escape justice;
2. Prosecution of policemen who supported the communal violence in Kandhamal;
3. Prosecution of all those who are responsible for forcible conversions to Hinduism;
4. Transfer investigation of the Kandhamal violence to the Central Bureau of Investigation or SIT;
5. Full compensation for the over 5,600 houses destroyed in mass arson;
6. Compensation for victims of gender violence;
7. Compensation for loss of livelihood for two years;
8. Full compensation to all next of kin of those who died in the riots;
9. Resettlement of victims with provision of security in their villages;
10. Employment for men and women victims;
11. Trauma counselling for children, women and men;
12. Assistance for children, especially girls who cannot continue their education as their school certificates have been burnt;
13. Assistance for a large number of survivors whose documents of land and property were destroyed;
14. Implementation of a basic witness protection scheme and provision of assistance and remuneration to victims in order to ensure their testimony in court;
15. Repeal of the Orissa Freedom of Religion Act, 1967, which fuels prejudice towards religious minorities;
16. Establishment of a State Commission for Minorities, on the model of the national Commission for Minorities;
17. Prosecution of District, state and administrative officials for their dereliction of duty during violence and rehabilitation
[This article has also been published in the Indian Currents, New Delhi in its edition dated 22 August 2010]
Monday, August 16, 2010
Raphael Cheenath of Kandhamal
Admiral of the Faith
By John Dayal
August 2010
In a year which marks the Centenary of Blessed Mother Teresa and of Saint Alphonsa, most would find it difficult to find another authentic Christian hero for the Faithful in India. Raphael Cheenath would possibly blush if someone were to describe him as a living Saint -- if a tall deeply tanned and well built man in his late Seventies, who has seen both the urbane world and the deep of the forests, can indeed blush. But the Archbishop of Cuttack Bhubaneswar, and as he is now better known across the globe, “Archbishop Cheenath of Kandhamal”, is indeed one of a kind, a hero of the faith for Catholics, Episcopal and Evangelical Christians. This for having provided leadership to a battered and fragile community consisting of indigenous Tribal Kondh people and Dalit Panos groups, the poorest and the most marginalised segments of the population, to stand up to the worst form of persecution Christians have faced in over three hundred years. The last such large scale violence against the faithful was at the hands of Tipu Sultan, King of Mysore, who ravished the West coast of the Konkan and drove the Catholics on a long march to captivity.
What Cheenath and his people faced was the full hatred of India’s emergent neo-fascist religious bigots, described by political scientists as the Sangh Parivar. This is a pseudo-military political conglomeration believing in the right of their upper caste co-religionists to be the true and only inheritors of India, with Muslims and Christians in particular as aliens who have no place in the motherland. This group, which took inspiration from the Nazi and fascist traditions of Adolf Hitler and Il Duce Mussolini from the Europe of the 1920s and 1930s, has been unhappy at India’s partition with the Muslim dominated western regions becoming the Islamic republic of Pakistan. They transferred their political angst into an animosity against Indian Muslims. This animosity has triggered perhaps twenty thousand riots in fifty years against the Muslims, who form just over ten per cent of the population. The Sangh hatred of Christians – who are less than 2.4 per cent of the national population -- was perhaps even deeper, partly by identifying the community with the imperial British who ruled India for more than a Hundred years, and partly for seeing in proselytising Christian missionaries a threat to the core of Hinduism itself. This led to a series of violent acts, sporadic in the first forty years of Independence of India in 1947, but bursting into the open in the mid 1990s, mostly in Gujarat, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh.
The Sangh violence of the 1990s against Christians saw the emergence of Archbishop Alan De Lastic of Delhi as the undisputed leader and spokesman of the Christian community in the country. Alan took to advocacy at the highest level, representing the community’s cause with the highest political leadership in the land, and when that failed to rouse the national conscience, led the community into radical action, including all India agitation such as the strike of 4 December 1998 which saw every educational and medical institution run by the community close down for a day in protest.
The government’s response, then, and of the Bharatiya Janata party now, was to call for a national debate on conversions, a ruse repeatedly used by the Sangh Parivar to coerce the community and subvert Constitutional guarantees of freedom of faith.
The Sangh violence in Kandhamal was at a much higher pitch, lasted much longer and affected more people than the mayhem had in 1998 or even earlier. When the fires died down in the plateau of Kandhamal right in the middle of the State of Orissa, more than 54,000 people had become refugees in their own homeland, Over 400 villages had been purged of all Christian presence, a hundred people had been killed and over 5,600 houses burnt. Children lost their childhood, those going to school lost years of academic progress. A Nun was gang raped, and there were reports of many other rapes and molestation. Girls were molested, and into the third year, some had been victims of human trafficking. For many, the trauma was worse – they had been told they could not return to their villages till they became Hindus, a process accomplished by forcibly shearing off their hair and making them drink a mixture of the dung and urine of a cow. Most refused and were severely beaten up and brutalised. They remain the real heroes.
In a way, Cheenath had a lifetime of experience in the tribal regions of central India to know how to respond even to the unexpected. Raphael Cheenath, born in Manalur, Kerala on 29 December 1934 joined the Society of the Divine Word, worked in Madhya Pradesh and Orissa as a missionary and priest, and was eventually appointed Bishop of Sambalpur, before being named 1 July 1985 as the second Archbishop of Cuttack-Bhubaneswar Archdiocese. As missionary, priest, Bishop and Archbishop, he had worked closely with the Dalit and Tribal communities. It is an interesting factoid that his Bishop’s house is almost entirely staffed by people from Kandhamal.
When violence broke out, first in December 2007 at Christmas-time and then in August 2008, it was natural and swift for a duty-bound Cheenath to convey the cries and the anguish of the victims to the national political and governmental leadership. With other colleagues of the Episcopacy in the Catholic Bishops Conference of India, he met the President of India and the Prime minister, the Governor and the Chief Minister. When the Chief Minister refused to meet the Christian delegation which had called on him, Cheenath led the clergy group to stage a Gandhian “dharna” or sit-in at the residence of the Chief Minister till the man, Mr Naveen Pattnaik, agreed to meet them.
The fires however continued to rage in the forests. It was the forest, like a mother, which sheltered the refugees, preventing a much higher death toll. But they were without relief. The district officers refused permission for Church agencies to bring in relief. The Sangh had feared that church relief agencies would further convert people or spread Christianity! The media was not helpful.
Cheenath had the courage to go to court. He has consistently shown this commitment to justice, to the need to challenge the legal system of the country to deliver justice to religious minorities. This is not as easy as it sounds. Justice still eludes most in Kandhamal, and it is the legal review system that has been put ion place by the church that is ensuring that the Fat Track courts trying several of the criminal cases are closely monitored and preparations made for remedial action.
Cheenath’s writ petition in the Supreme Court of India was the first of the many steps that would have to be taken in courts big and small, and it produced results. If over 2,000 of the houses have now been completed and relief agencies are working, it is because of that court action.
Cheenath would sound out the justice system more than once. He became the first Archbishop, or Christian leader, in living memory to appear before a Judicial Commission, the Justice Panigrahi Commission, to put on record the plight of the common an the poor of his community. He refused to be cowed by the cross examination of hostile lawyers, most of whom were politically aligned with the Sangh Parivar.
It has been this charismatic leadership in all sectors – the justice system, the relief and rehabilitation, and the matter of faith – that Cheenath has been successful in strengthening the spiritual values of the people and of his clergy and restoring faith in the system, which had been shattered. In fact, government and judiciary owe him a debt of gratitude for this, for it would have been so easy for the frustrated and the angry to lose faith in democratic processes and institutions when faced with the magnitude of the crisis and the initial hostility of police and administration.
It is not that the Archbishop has not faced charges from the lesser informed among clergy and lay persons, mostly for not being physically present in Kandhamal in the initial weeks, and coming first to Delhi and then staying back in the Bishops House in Bhubaneswar. But to say this is to not fully understand the geography of the area and the political and violence situation. There was hardly a Catholic institutional building intact in the entire region. It may, by the way, be recalled that a bomb was thrown at Bishop’s house during Christmas 2007; the complaint of this was made to the police by no less than Father Bernard Digal, then Treasurer of the Archdiocese. One of the great tragedies of Kandhamal was the martyrdom of Fr Bernard, who left the comparative security of Bishops’ house to travel close to 300 kilometres to see the ground situation in the district, which also happened to be his homeland. His own village had been devastated. His brother and family had seen their hut being burnt to the ground, and were now staying with thousands of others in a refugee camp. Bernard was waylaid, and beaten savagely, and then left for dead. He was rescued by others a day alter, brought to hospital. He almost recovered after intensive treatment in Mumbai, but eventually succumbed to his internal injuries and complications in a hospital in Chennai just when everyone was expecting him to be declared cured.
That showed the threat to all clergy and religious, especially women who were absolutely not safe. The Archbishop had been identified by the Sangh Parivar and named as their main enemy. The Sangh staged dharna and agitations in Bhubaneswar asking for his immediate arrest, tighter with Rajya Sabha member Radha Kant Nayak and a couple of others. The threat to the Archbishop’s life and liberty was very real. The Sangh was trying hard to implicate him and some other Catholic leaders in the murder of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad vice president Lakshmanananda Saraswati whose murder, acknowledged to be their handiwork by left-wing militant Maoist groups of the region, that had triggered off the violence. The body of this man had been taken in a procession of over 200 kilometres through the hills and valleys of Kandhamal, accompanied not just by Sangh leaders, but even by the highest district civil and police authorities who ten stood by while well armed mobs used direr and knife to lay into the Christian community village after village. The district authorities were just not ready to take the risk for a survey of the violence by the Archbishop, afraid both for his security and possibly that his presence could make the Christian community rise in revolt in the refugee camps where living conditions were barely fit for animals. And when finally Cheenath did come to the district, it had to be while being escorted by an armed convoy.
There had also been charges, muttered silently and gossiped through SMS messages and emails that while Pentecost pastors stayed with the community even in refugee camps, the Catholic priests had gone to the forests. Cheenath had even in the Christmas 2007 violence given clear instructions to the men and women under his charge – human lives were precious and sacred, but buildings could be rebuilt. Catholic fathers including parish priests saw their churches burn as they fled to the forests, but many of the parishes were coming alive within months of the return of peace, the lone priest living in the ashes of the parish church, so to speak, of perhaps a single surviving room in what was once his home. Catholic institutions were the main target of the violence of 2008, but it is the resilience of the church and the strength of its leadership – including the courage of individual priests – that the Church is alive once again in the forests of Kandhamal.
Cheenath has toured Europe and other countries, but more important, it has been his witness in many states in the country that has encouraged and strengthened the community and given it hope. His evidence before visiting human rights groups, and as important, before emissaries of various countries and the international human rights movement, including the Untied Nations Human Rights Council through its Special Rapporteur, that Cheenath ahs been successful in explaining to the world at large the danger that neo Nazi and fascist groups, riding a narrow religious nationalism, pose not just to India, but to international peace. We cannot say this of many other religious leaders in the country today. As someone who has seen him at close quarters over the last three years, I have come to respect and admire Archbishop Raphael Cheenath. His life remains under threat. But Cheenath has been a veritable Admiral, leading his men, of course, but also steering the community to security, and peace while maintaining pressure on the State to give Justice to the victims.
By John Dayal
August 2010
In a year which marks the Centenary of Blessed Mother Teresa and of Saint Alphonsa, most would find it difficult to find another authentic Christian hero for the Faithful in India. Raphael Cheenath would possibly blush if someone were to describe him as a living Saint -- if a tall deeply tanned and well built man in his late Seventies, who has seen both the urbane world and the deep of the forests, can indeed blush. But the Archbishop of Cuttack Bhubaneswar, and as he is now better known across the globe, “Archbishop Cheenath of Kandhamal”, is indeed one of a kind, a hero of the faith for Catholics, Episcopal and Evangelical Christians. This for having provided leadership to a battered and fragile community consisting of indigenous Tribal Kondh people and Dalit Panos groups, the poorest and the most marginalised segments of the population, to stand up to the worst form of persecution Christians have faced in over three hundred years. The last such large scale violence against the faithful was at the hands of Tipu Sultan, King of Mysore, who ravished the West coast of the Konkan and drove the Catholics on a long march to captivity.
What Cheenath and his people faced was the full hatred of India’s emergent neo-fascist religious bigots, described by political scientists as the Sangh Parivar. This is a pseudo-military political conglomeration believing in the right of their upper caste co-religionists to be the true and only inheritors of India, with Muslims and Christians in particular as aliens who have no place in the motherland. This group, which took inspiration from the Nazi and fascist traditions of Adolf Hitler and Il Duce Mussolini from the Europe of the 1920s and 1930s, has been unhappy at India’s partition with the Muslim dominated western regions becoming the Islamic republic of Pakistan. They transferred their political angst into an animosity against Indian Muslims. This animosity has triggered perhaps twenty thousand riots in fifty years against the Muslims, who form just over ten per cent of the population. The Sangh hatred of Christians – who are less than 2.4 per cent of the national population -- was perhaps even deeper, partly by identifying the community with the imperial British who ruled India for more than a Hundred years, and partly for seeing in proselytising Christian missionaries a threat to the core of Hinduism itself. This led to a series of violent acts, sporadic in the first forty years of Independence of India in 1947, but bursting into the open in the mid 1990s, mostly in Gujarat, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh.
The Sangh violence of the 1990s against Christians saw the emergence of Archbishop Alan De Lastic of Delhi as the undisputed leader and spokesman of the Christian community in the country. Alan took to advocacy at the highest level, representing the community’s cause with the highest political leadership in the land, and when that failed to rouse the national conscience, led the community into radical action, including all India agitation such as the strike of 4 December 1998 which saw every educational and medical institution run by the community close down for a day in protest.
The government’s response, then, and of the Bharatiya Janata party now, was to call for a national debate on conversions, a ruse repeatedly used by the Sangh Parivar to coerce the community and subvert Constitutional guarantees of freedom of faith.
The Sangh violence in Kandhamal was at a much higher pitch, lasted much longer and affected more people than the mayhem had in 1998 or even earlier. When the fires died down in the plateau of Kandhamal right in the middle of the State of Orissa, more than 54,000 people had become refugees in their own homeland, Over 400 villages had been purged of all Christian presence, a hundred people had been killed and over 5,600 houses burnt. Children lost their childhood, those going to school lost years of academic progress. A Nun was gang raped, and there were reports of many other rapes and molestation. Girls were molested, and into the third year, some had been victims of human trafficking. For many, the trauma was worse – they had been told they could not return to their villages till they became Hindus, a process accomplished by forcibly shearing off their hair and making them drink a mixture of the dung and urine of a cow. Most refused and were severely beaten up and brutalised. They remain the real heroes.
In a way, Cheenath had a lifetime of experience in the tribal regions of central India to know how to respond even to the unexpected. Raphael Cheenath, born in Manalur, Kerala on 29 December 1934 joined the Society of the Divine Word, worked in Madhya Pradesh and Orissa as a missionary and priest, and was eventually appointed Bishop of Sambalpur, before being named 1 July 1985 as the second Archbishop of Cuttack-Bhubaneswar Archdiocese. As missionary, priest, Bishop and Archbishop, he had worked closely with the Dalit and Tribal communities. It is an interesting factoid that his Bishop’s house is almost entirely staffed by people from Kandhamal.
When violence broke out, first in December 2007 at Christmas-time and then in August 2008, it was natural and swift for a duty-bound Cheenath to convey the cries and the anguish of the victims to the national political and governmental leadership. With other colleagues of the Episcopacy in the Catholic Bishops Conference of India, he met the President of India and the Prime minister, the Governor and the Chief Minister. When the Chief Minister refused to meet the Christian delegation which had called on him, Cheenath led the clergy group to stage a Gandhian “dharna” or sit-in at the residence of the Chief Minister till the man, Mr Naveen Pattnaik, agreed to meet them.
The fires however continued to rage in the forests. It was the forest, like a mother, which sheltered the refugees, preventing a much higher death toll. But they were without relief. The district officers refused permission for Church agencies to bring in relief. The Sangh had feared that church relief agencies would further convert people or spread Christianity! The media was not helpful.
Cheenath had the courage to go to court. He has consistently shown this commitment to justice, to the need to challenge the legal system of the country to deliver justice to religious minorities. This is not as easy as it sounds. Justice still eludes most in Kandhamal, and it is the legal review system that has been put ion place by the church that is ensuring that the Fat Track courts trying several of the criminal cases are closely monitored and preparations made for remedial action.
Cheenath’s writ petition in the Supreme Court of India was the first of the many steps that would have to be taken in courts big and small, and it produced results. If over 2,000 of the houses have now been completed and relief agencies are working, it is because of that court action.
Cheenath would sound out the justice system more than once. He became the first Archbishop, or Christian leader, in living memory to appear before a Judicial Commission, the Justice Panigrahi Commission, to put on record the plight of the common an the poor of his community. He refused to be cowed by the cross examination of hostile lawyers, most of whom were politically aligned with the Sangh Parivar.
It has been this charismatic leadership in all sectors – the justice system, the relief and rehabilitation, and the matter of faith – that Cheenath has been successful in strengthening the spiritual values of the people and of his clergy and restoring faith in the system, which had been shattered. In fact, government and judiciary owe him a debt of gratitude for this, for it would have been so easy for the frustrated and the angry to lose faith in democratic processes and institutions when faced with the magnitude of the crisis and the initial hostility of police and administration.
It is not that the Archbishop has not faced charges from the lesser informed among clergy and lay persons, mostly for not being physically present in Kandhamal in the initial weeks, and coming first to Delhi and then staying back in the Bishops House in Bhubaneswar. But to say this is to not fully understand the geography of the area and the political and violence situation. There was hardly a Catholic institutional building intact in the entire region. It may, by the way, be recalled that a bomb was thrown at Bishop’s house during Christmas 2007; the complaint of this was made to the police by no less than Father Bernard Digal, then Treasurer of the Archdiocese. One of the great tragedies of Kandhamal was the martyrdom of Fr Bernard, who left the comparative security of Bishops’ house to travel close to 300 kilometres to see the ground situation in the district, which also happened to be his homeland. His own village had been devastated. His brother and family had seen their hut being burnt to the ground, and were now staying with thousands of others in a refugee camp. Bernard was waylaid, and beaten savagely, and then left for dead. He was rescued by others a day alter, brought to hospital. He almost recovered after intensive treatment in Mumbai, but eventually succumbed to his internal injuries and complications in a hospital in Chennai just when everyone was expecting him to be declared cured.
That showed the threat to all clergy and religious, especially women who were absolutely not safe. The Archbishop had been identified by the Sangh Parivar and named as their main enemy. The Sangh staged dharna and agitations in Bhubaneswar asking for his immediate arrest, tighter with Rajya Sabha member Radha Kant Nayak and a couple of others. The threat to the Archbishop’s life and liberty was very real. The Sangh was trying hard to implicate him and some other Catholic leaders in the murder of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad vice president Lakshmanananda Saraswati whose murder, acknowledged to be their handiwork by left-wing militant Maoist groups of the region, that had triggered off the violence. The body of this man had been taken in a procession of over 200 kilometres through the hills and valleys of Kandhamal, accompanied not just by Sangh leaders, but even by the highest district civil and police authorities who ten stood by while well armed mobs used direr and knife to lay into the Christian community village after village. The district authorities were just not ready to take the risk for a survey of the violence by the Archbishop, afraid both for his security and possibly that his presence could make the Christian community rise in revolt in the refugee camps where living conditions were barely fit for animals. And when finally Cheenath did come to the district, it had to be while being escorted by an armed convoy.
There had also been charges, muttered silently and gossiped through SMS messages and emails that while Pentecost pastors stayed with the community even in refugee camps, the Catholic priests had gone to the forests. Cheenath had even in the Christmas 2007 violence given clear instructions to the men and women under his charge – human lives were precious and sacred, but buildings could be rebuilt. Catholic fathers including parish priests saw their churches burn as they fled to the forests, but many of the parishes were coming alive within months of the return of peace, the lone priest living in the ashes of the parish church, so to speak, of perhaps a single surviving room in what was once his home. Catholic institutions were the main target of the violence of 2008, but it is the resilience of the church and the strength of its leadership – including the courage of individual priests – that the Church is alive once again in the forests of Kandhamal.
Cheenath has toured Europe and other countries, but more important, it has been his witness in many states in the country that has encouraged and strengthened the community and given it hope. His evidence before visiting human rights groups, and as important, before emissaries of various countries and the international human rights movement, including the Untied Nations Human Rights Council through its Special Rapporteur, that Cheenath ahs been successful in explaining to the world at large the danger that neo Nazi and fascist groups, riding a narrow religious nationalism, pose not just to India, but to international peace. We cannot say this of many other religious leaders in the country today. As someone who has seen him at close quarters over the last three years, I have come to respect and admire Archbishop Raphael Cheenath. His life remains under threat. But Cheenath has been a veritable Admiral, leading his men, of course, but also steering the community to security, and peace while maintaining pressure on the State to give Justice to the victims.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)